Search for: "United States of America v. Lujan"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
The case is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
Lujan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
” Lujan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
But the first Defendant is the United States of America. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
In support, Apple cites United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
In Lujan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
Ciudad Juarez and El Paso are located next to each other on the border between the United States of America and the United States of Mexico. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
The first word on the matter was Judge Neal Peters McCurn in Indium Corp. of America v. [read post]
